Latest Lists

When it comes to P4P list, who is more credible? Yahoo Sports or Ring Magazine?

I personally think that Ring's reason for maintaining Manny Pacquiao as no.1 makes sense since Marquez is also current a top P4P fighter so how did Yahoo Sports thought otherwise?

Public Comments

1. Ys
2. Ring Magazine also has Timothy Bradley as one of the top Pound for Pound fighters. Pound for Pound is all about opinion.
3. The reason for keeping Pac #1 is lame. It's just an opinion, yahoo and ring. Use your own eyes. To you, who has the most skills?
4. P4p ranking is like the bcs ranking hardly anyone agrees with each other about the slots
5. Yahoo has got more panelists coming from various countries including at least two from the Philippines. And I thought Pacfans do not trust in the Ring anymore because it is owned by pet peeve ODLH?
6. where pacman ranked number 1, then that is the more credible.
7. The Ring. The Ring is certainly more established than Yahoo Sports. The Ring have been around since 1922, the days of Jack Dempsey. But the reason Pacquiao is #1 is because he's alot more active than Mayweather Jr as Mayweather has only had 1 fight in 2011 and just ce back out from "retirement". I disagree and believe that Mayweather should be #1, not due to accomplishments but P4P skill and versatility. The Ring has even predicted that fighters like Mike Tyson would be Heavyweight Champion of the World and it happened. Yahoo Sports ate good but to answer your question, Ring Magazine is more established.
8. They are just opinions. It really does not matter. All these boxers are top notch , dedicated men who work their azz off before every fight.
9. RING
10. RING magazine is more credible because they're more knowledgeable about the fighters past and present