Latest Lists

Do you think a book should be banned from the library just becasue it uses bad language?

It's for homework. I'm supposed to interview different people and wirte down thier responses. It's mainly about Catcher In The Rye. If you've read it you know it has bad language, sexual themes, and has a mentally unstable person as the hero of the story. So do you think that's a good reason to ban a book from a library/reading list for school? Thank you for any answers. I really appreciate them all.

Public Comments

1. The book is famous. It should not be censored. It should not be banned. Parents have the right to ask for an alternative book for their child.
2. I agree with red unicorn. It isn't hard to make up 30 permission slips and offer an equally good but less explicit alternative assignment. I'd ban it before I'd censor it, if it were a school library. Though neither should happen, there is an age-appropriateness to everything. But I'd burn my own book before some asshole censored the fucking thing. If you're going to rip apart a moment in my book you're ripping apart my spirit and I don't take kindly to it. I'd imagine many writers feel the same way.
3. No! It's that kind of censorship that we've been fighting(and evidently will continue to fight) for as long as their are people who want to put braces on our brains and prevent us from thinking for ourselves,forming our own opinions and conclusions and what have you. If parents were more involved and less sensitive to whether little Pete or Susie is getting their egos massaged and took a proactive part in their raising,we wouldn't have the Right conjuring up bogeymen to scare otherwise normal people into cowering sheep,standing around waiting for the government to tell them what is or is not acceptable
4. well no but yes. You see the politically correct answer would be yes. That means noone would be offended by it anymore. But so little people are going to be affected by saying a swear word here and there that it wouldnt matter. its all really the political correctness saying its bad.
5. Depends on what library. A library or department of a library for children under the age of 12 should not have books with inappropriate language or adult situations. Let them be children as long as possible! And no, books should not be banned, but some ought to have ratings on the outside for those who would like to avoid the objectionable!
6. It shouldn't be banned. When I used to teach 8th grade English, I had one parent who didn't want her sons to read Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451. I found that quite ironic, especially when the mother said she had never read it and was basing her decision on her opinion "that the book looked scary." Censorship and ignorance tend to walk hand in hand.
7. Censorship is wrong. Also, "Catcher in The Rye" is a very highly read novel.
8. the book should have a warning on the front page, or inside the first few pages or on the back. if people can't handle that kind of stuff then they shouldnt read it. when i was in highschool they ALOT of books like that, but i was old and mature enough to handle it becuase it was just a book!!
9. "Bad language, sexual themes and mentally unstable"--sounds like they'd have to ban most of the students too (along with the books).