Latest Lists

Can u check this out for me please?

I wrote it for my english classes. Could you check if i did not make any mistakes? Thank you so much.. This website is an example of the news web page. It’s not quite clear what company or individual is responsible for the contents of the page. There is only an information that BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites. There is no more data which can tell us who properly is responsible of that. Down of the page there exist a couple of links which describe the goals of the company. We find there also data of the company such as its phone number, textphone, e-mail address and postal address which we can use to contact with it if we have got some questions or complaints. By putting that information bbc company seems to feel responsible for the content of the material. We are able to receive digital TV services and DAB digital radio as well what provides a way of verifying company’s legitimacy. The articles of this website are not undersigned with the names of the individuals who wrote it. There is a statement giving the company’s name as copyright holder. As I could notice there is no clearly listed sources for factual information which I can verify in another source. Website is free of grammatical or spelling or typographical errors however I am not able to read all of the articles to provide it. Moreover the website contains translations in many languages. The informational content is clearly separated from the well labeled advertising and opinion content. I think there is no link which takes me to the informational page which describes how frequently that material is updated. I can only guess that it should be done every day because of the news character of the website. There is also no indication of when the page was last updated. I could not find any information about when the page was placed on the Web. Most of the articles are made in printable versions. Most of those versions include same material. Moreover it consists the date of when was it published.

Public Comments

1. I just took what you did and changed a few things. I hope it helps a little. :) This website is an example of a news web page. It is not quite clear what company or individual is responsible for the contents of the page. There is only information that BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites. There is no more data which can tell us who properly is responsible of that. Down the page, there are a couple of links that describe the goals of the company. Also found there is data of the company such as its phone number, textphone, e-mail address and postal address These are the ways to contact the company if there are questions or complaints. It seems that by having this information on their website, BBC feels responsible for the content. We are able to receive digital TV services and DAB digital radio as well that provide a way of verifying the company’s legitimacy. The articles of this website are not signed with the names of the individuals who wrote them. There is a statement giving the company’s name as copyright holder. There are no clearly listed sources for factual information verifiable in another source. The website is free of grammatical, spelling, or typographical errors. However, I was not able to read all of the articles provided on the website. Moreover, the website contains translations in many languages. The informational content is clearly separated from the well-labeled advertising and opinion content. There was no link directly to the information page, which correlates with how frequently the material is updated. I would assume that it is done every day because of the news character of the website. There is also no indication of when the page was last updated. I could not find any information about when the page was placed on the Web. Most of the articles are made in printable versions. Most of those versions include the same material. I also has the date of when was it published.